Article #208, March 2014
The Michigan Society of American Foresters recently held a conference about forest regeneration. Foresters, perhaps more than any other group, tend to worry about what the next forest will look like – decades down the road. And, they are uniquely suited for these prognostications.
A century of research and practice has produced a set of management prescriptions that effectively regenerate our Lake States forests, and also provide wood products, forest health, and a wide range of other environmental and social services. These management systems are designed to provide forest conditions that favor the natural regeneration of trees. Trees are actually pretty good at reproducing themselves, when given a chance.
The heart of forest management is a science called silviculture, which is the study and practice of forest ecology to provide all the goods and services that society demands. It’s sort of like agriculture, but much more complex. Regeneration is at the root of silviculture (excuse the pun!).
The Lake States forest consists of a wide range of forest types, each with their own set of ecological requirements. Shade tolerance, disturbance, a seed source, and seed bed conditions are four key variables for regeneration. Management systems are tailored for different forest types. There is no “one size fits all” approach.
For many decades, the application of particular practices, under appropriate conditions, regenerated forests with a high degree of reliability. Aspen and jack pine are two species that evolved with major disturbances and require full sunlight, so clearcutting was employed to mimic natural circumstances. Sugar maple – beech – basswood forests, on good sites, are species that do much better with a selection system, which mimics smaller disturbances common in these kinds of forest types. Foresters evaluate forest conditions, take into account forest owner goals, and then design management plans accordingly. It’s a rewarding experience for both the forester and the forest owner.
Unfortunately, there are several threats to forest regeneration and some of the traditional management systems may no longer yield the expected results. Foresters are faced with altered successional pathways, novel forest communities, and a less predictable future. Failure to regenerate forests could result in the loss of forest certification status, which would threaten a regional industry worth tens of billions of dollars.
Deer pose a huge threat, but this idea is a hot-button issue for many. In 2007, a survey revealed that the majority of Michigan foresters, collectively with over 400 years of experience, perceive deer depredation as a significant threat to forests. Ecological research literature across North America clearly supports this premise. Deer are, of course, a very natural part of Lake States forests and a crucial part of our hunting heritage. Their populations also vary widely across time and geography. However, long-term over-browsing translates into long-term negative impacts that are not easily reversed, even if the deer impacts were removed from the forest.
Exotic species, animals, plants, and fungi, are wild cards in their impact on forest regeneration. Research into known species impacts reveals a range of outcomes. Unfortunately, each new species can potentially change the game a bit more or, in some cases, dramatically. The exotics often work in concert with each other, and sometimes with native species, to alter seed bed conditions to the point that some native trees may not be able to adequately regenerate.
For example, earthworms, slugs, and certain shrubs (exotic players) will work with small rodents and deer (native players) to discriminate against the regeneration of native ground flora and tree species. Simple elimination of the exotic species may not result in the restoration of natural conditions.
Forest parcelization (ownership) and fragmentation (permanent canopy disruption) change forest structure, composition, and function. Smaller parcels and higher numbers of owners in a particular area make for an increasingly difficult and expensive opportunity for management and/or restoration. The human element also accelerates exotic introductions and, in many cases, higher deer numbers.
All of these ecological dynamics exist in an era of rapidly changing climate conditions. Rapid is defined in decades, in this case. As current trends continue with precipitation, temperature, wind, and growing seasons, so changes the forests. Nobody is confident in defining these changes, but nearly everyone knows that change is in the wind (another bad pun?).
Lastly, benign neglect of forests (doing nothing) allows all these agents to operate unchecked, sometimes with undesirable outcomes for both the forest and human society. Benign neglect may also allow native pests and diseases to unnecessarily gain the upper-hand, at least for a while. These pests evolved with our native forests. However, the forests have changed considerably over the last two hundred years. Relationships between the forests and pests have changed.
New forest stressors work with the usual stressors in both predictable and currently unpredictable ways. The massive historical disturbances associated with the Lake States logging era will likely pale in comparison with the challenges our forests face in coming decades. That sounds like a long time, but for foresters, it’s not much more than the blink of an eye.
- 30 -
Bill Cook is an MSU Extension forester providing educational programming for the Upper Peninsula. His office is located at the MSU Forest Biomass Innovation Center near Escanaba. The Center is the headquarters for three MSU Forestry properties in the U.P., with a combined area of about 8,000 acres. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 906-786-1575.
by Bill Cook, Forester/Biologist, Michigan State University Extension, 6005
J Road, Escanaba, MI 49829
906-786-1575 (voice), 906-786-9370 (fax), e-mail: email@example.com
of these articles is encouraged. Please notify Bill Cook.
By-line should read "Bill Cook, MSU Extension" Please use the article trailer whenever possible.
Michigan State University is an affirmative action equal opportunity institution. The U.S. Department of Agriculture prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital status or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)
This website is maintained by Bill Cook, Michigan State University Extension Forest in the Upper Peninsula. Comments, questions, and suggestions are gratefully accepted.
Last update of this page was 2 April, 2014
This site is hosted by School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science at Michigan Technological University.